Design Philosophy
When beginning this project, the team examined a wide range of literature and conducted a number of informal interviews with leading thinkers, educationalists, teachers and designers on designing space for personalised learning. That investigation resulted in a number of design philosophies, which have been used as the foundation of our approach to this project.

“Its architecture shapes the way a school looks and feels to the people inside and the wider community. It determines how the spaces can be used over the lifetime of the building and the degree to which it can adapt to new needs in the future.” - CABE
English schools are on the cusp of system wide transformation, in terms of how learning and teaching is organised but also in relation to the spaces where learning takes place.
The vast majority of the schools from the two great waves of school building reflect the ‘one size fits all’ approach to education in very literal way; schools are a physical manifestation of a mass production model of education. The intervening decades have seen a revolution in educational theory and practice.
Questions are now being asked in schools about whether we will be talking about the ‘classroom’ in the future, and that perhaps the term classroom unnecessarily narrows discussion. In his book, Building type basics for college and university facilities, David J. Neuman of Stanford University refers to the place of learning and he suggests this “more accurately reflects the fact that much learning can and should take place outside the traditional classroom environment.”
He goes further to suggest that:
“Classroom design must rise to this great diversity in subject matter and teaching/learning styles. The growing use of interactive, as opposed to didactic, teaching methods is having a profound effect on the design of classrooms.”
School environments have a profound affect on young people and children and their engagement with learning. School environments have both contributed to transformation and also constrained it.
Design Philosophies
Contemporary literature on learning environments has brought to light the importance of the connection between teaching and learning styles and spatial organisation.
An understanding of spatial theories and how they support educational philosophies should lead to the creation of enhanced personalised learning environments.
It is clear that it is important to first understand the underlying design philosophies which will support an educational philosophy and then, following this, one can then begin to understand the more detailed components that might create more specific spaces supporting pedagogies and activities.
Modern environments for personalised learning should break down the traditional notions of how to deliver education by blurring the boundaries between learner and teacher and allowing for a more shared environmental control. Spatial changes in the learning environment have a role in changing the traditional mindsets and allowing for the creation innovative approaches to teaching and learning.
Seven design philosophies have emerged from literature relating to personalised learning, and these concepts form a foundation for the design approach of this project.
Explore
-
Diversity
Space should be designed for a purpose and should clearly communicate what activities the space is meant to support.
-
Responsiveness
The ability for space to be responsive to change comes up repeatedly
in literature in various forms.
-
Fluidity
Fluidity refers to how the environment, on the whole, flows, and whether spaces are organised in an integrated and blended way both physically and virtually. A fluid environment has spaces that seamlessly link the diverse settings that support specific pedagogies.
-
Human Centricity
Human-centred design relates to many other factors that have an environmental and psychological impact on the user’s empowerment to shape the spaces in a way that best suits his or her teaching and learning styles.
-
Community Integration
Research on learning theory by Diana Oblinger has found that people learn best in communities where collaborative learning and student engagement take place. When a group of people with a common purpose, shared values and goals come together it motivates it members.
-
Dynamism
The school as a designed product should not be regarded as complete and static, but should be regarded as permanently incomplete and dynamic, characterized by continuous change, evolution and progress.
-
Technological
Technology is shifting the boundaries of where learning can take place, and is changing the experiences, needs and desires of learners.